Understanding AI Agents: How They Differ from Workflows and Why They Are Reshaping Automation
- Thanos Athanasiadis

- Oct 10
- 4 min read
As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, one term has started to appear more often in business and technology conversations: AI Agents. Despite the growing attention, there is still a lot of confusion about what AI agents actually are, how they function, and how they differ from traditional automated workflows.
Let’s explore what defines an AI Agent, how it compares to a workflow, and why this distinction is not just technical but deeply strategic.
What Are AI Agents?
At a high level, AI Agents are programs where the outputs of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT, Claude, or Gemini control the workflow.
Instead of following a fixed set of coded steps, an AI Agent makes decisions in real time. It interprets context, chooses tools, plans the next actions, and executes them autonomously.
In practice, an AI Agent might include one or several of the following components:
Multiple LLM Calls: The agent does not rely on a single prompt and response. It uses several reasoning loops to process information, reflect, and decide what to do next.
LLMs with Tool Use: The agent can call external tools or APIs such as CRMs, analytics dashboards, or booking systems to complete actions beyond text generation.
Interactive Environments: Agents often operate in systems where multiple LLMs or components exchange data and coordinate tasks.
A Planner: This component determines what the agent should do next, breaking a complex goal into smaller and achievable steps.
Autonomy: The defining feature of an AI agent is its ability to act independently once deployed, adjusting behavior based on feedback or results.
In simple terms, an AI Agent is a system that can decide how to decide. It does not just execute instructions but actively shapes the workflow while it operates.
The Ambiguity Around the Term “Agent”
The word “Agent” is used in many ways across the AI community. Some use it to describe simple chatbots or rule-based systems. However, a true agent, especially in the generative AI era, is built around decision-making autonomy rather than simple automation.
To understand what makes it unique, we need to compare it with workflows.
Agents vs. Workflows: The Key Difference
According to Anthropic, the company behind Claude, AI-driven systems typically fall into two categories: Workflows and Agents.
1. Workflows
Workflows are structured systems where LLMs and tools are orchestrated through predefined code paths.They are predictable, linear, and rule-based. A good example of a workflow is an automated email sequence or a Zapier integration that follows a clear “if-this-then-that” logic.
Workflows are ideal when you need:
Consistency: Every execution follows the same structure.
Reliability: There is little room for unexpected behavior.
Efficiency: Repetitive and well-defined processes run smoothly.
The main limitation is that workflows cannot adapt easily when new information or unexpected inputs appear. They work best when the path is already known.
2. Agents
Agents are very different. They dynamically direct their own processes and tool usage, maintaining control over how they accomplish each task.
Agents are capable of:
Choosing which tools to use and when.
Adjusting strategies mid-process based on new context.
Learning from previous results.
Communicating with other agents or human users in real time.
In short, workflows follow a script, while agents write their own script as they go.
How AI Agents Actually Operate
To understand how an AI Agent works in practice, let’s look at its core operating loop:
PerceptionThe agent receives input. This could be a user question, data from an API, or an event inside a system.
ReasoningThe agent uses an LLM to interpret the input, analyze context, and determine what needs to happen next.
PlanningThe internal planner breaks the main goal into smaller steps, sequencing them logically. For example, research → summarize → draft → send.
Tool UseThe agent calls APIs, triggers scripts, or interacts with software tools to perform actions.
Reflection and IterationThe output is evaluated, refined, and rerun if needed. This creates a feedback loop that helps the agent continuously improve.
This cycle can repeat as many times as necessary, allowing the agent to adapt its behavior based on results and context.
Why This Matters for Businesses
For companies exploring AI adoption, understanding the difference between agents and workflows is essential.
Workflows are ideal for fixed processes that are consistent and repetitive.
Agents excel in dynamic environments where decisions, adaptability, and learning drive results.
An AI Agent can manage leads at any time of day, adjust tone and messaging, follow up automatically, and update your CRM without being told exactly how to handle every situation. This flexibility is what makes agents so powerful for sales, customer service, and marketing automation.
The shift from workflows to agents represents the move from “automation” to “intelligence.”
The Future of Agentic Systems
We are now entering what many call the agentic phase of AI adoption. Systems are evolving from tools that execute instructions to collaborators that share responsibility for outcomes.
As language models continue to improve, AI agents will act more like digital colleagues. They will handle outreach, research, coordination, and even creative work with minimal supervision.
Future organizations might operate through networks of specialized agents connected across departments. Marketing agents will coordinate with analytics agents, which in turn communicate with operations agents. Each one will specialize in a function yet remain part of a larger intelligent ecosystem.
Companies that begin experimenting with agents now will be best prepared for this shift. Starting small with goal-focused agents that learn and improve over time is the best path forward.
Final Thoughts
AI Agents are more than a new form of technology. They represent a fundamental change in how work is structured and executed.
While workflows automate predictable tasks, agents bring intelligence to unpredictable situations. The distinction between automation and reasoning is starting to blur, and understanding that line is essential for any business aiming to stay competitive in the AI era.
